The scientific perspective... - Yes, sound is made: A falling tree causes a disturbance that creates vibrations in the air, which are physical pressure waves. - Sound waves are created: These pressure waves travel through the air regardless of whether an ear is present to sense them. - "Sound" is the perception: While a human brain interprets these waves as a crash, the waves themselves exist independently of that interpretation. The philosophical perspective... - No, sound is not made: If "sound" is defined as the experience of hearing, then a falling tree makes no sound if there is no one (or no animal) to hear it. - Observation is key: This viewpoint argues that an object or event doesn't have a property (like "sound") until it is observed or perceived by a conscious subject. - It depends on the definition: The answer hinges on the distinction between the physical phenomenon (vibrations) and the subjective experience (the perception of hearing). The nihilistic perspective... - The Question Itself is Meaningless. The entire premise is a futile exercise. The tree falling is a random, meaningless event in an indifferent universe. - There is no such thing as objective truth. Therefore, if all values and truths are baseless, then the "truth" about the tree's sound is also irrelevant. There is no ultimate, grand truth to uncover, so debating definitions of "sound" is pointless. - The tree, the forest, the observer, and even the concept of sound itself hold no intrinsic value. The event of the tree falling is just a natural, non-significant occurrence. - The human tendency to debate such abstract, unanswerable questions is an example of humanity's futile search for meaning where there is none.